Why the Moon?
by Eric R. Hedman Monday, May 12, 2008
To say there is uncertainty over NASA's future is an understatement. None of the
three
remaining presidential candidates have solidly endorsed the return to the Moon.
One is
calling for delaying Constellation program to pay for an early childhood
program. One
wants to freeze funding of all agencies with the exception of Defense and
Veterans Affairs
for a year while assessing their futures. And one praises NASA with generalities
and gives
no details on the expected level of support. The support for NASA from these
three is
underwhelming at best.
Politicians are very nearsighted when it comes to thinking about programs that
will pay off
when they are out of office or after the next election. That is one of the
reasons our
country is facing such an amalgam of challenges. Our leaders behave like they're
trying to
put band-aids on the hull of the Titanic to keep it from sinking. It looks like
they're doing
something, but it has negligible effect.
Some people argue that if we only turned our attention to Mars for the next
generation we
would excite the public into supporting that. I don't see that as a possibility.
A story that resonated with me that my 90-year-old father told me a few weeks
ago is one
that probably could be used by politicians to argue for some other shortsighted
fix. When
my father goes grocery shopping he goes to a store frequented by many other
elderly
people. In this new age of rapidly rising food and energy prices, he has noticed
a change
in behavior of other elderly shoppers. He quite often sees them pick up a
product, look at
the price, and put it back on the shelf. Politicians see the need for a tax
rebate to put
money in people's pockets. I will cash my check, but I see it as a band-aid that
is needed
because of a myopic approach to our nation's energy needs. Bickering in our
government
has meant that we have never had a good plan to meet our long-term energy needs.
I see
the same shortsighted approach being taken with our space program.
